Argentina is branded as the country
with the most protectionist measures and this comes with its disadvantaged and
advantages. Argentina is a country when you will find no more “made in China”
goods or cheap imported goods. The supermarkets are full of local produce with
a ban on gourmet food products. The government supports a policy of ‘buy local’
committing itself to a closed economy.
There are many advantages for the
domestic producer due to the restrictions on import. One of the major reasons
for Argentina to propose this policy is that it will help the domestic market
grow. Restrictions of imports force the consumers to buy domestic goods and in
turn increase the profitability of domestic producers. It forces the domestic
producers to become more efficient helping in the development of the country
overall. The competition provided by the international market will be a great
incentive for the domestic producers to be more efficient and innovative. This
is very important if Argentina wants to achieve a better economy in the long
term. Import substitution also helps improve the balance of payments as a
restriction means that there are more exports than imports. This would result
in the demand for Argentina’s currency, improving the currency of the country.
The aim of the country is not to protect itself by these measures, but to
increase domestic consumption so that the government revenue through taxes
increases and it is able to function more efficiently and able to pay off
debts.
There are a lot of disadvantages that
come with this decision for Argentina. The consumers are at a loss as Argentina
has imposed a 15% tax on the use of credit cards in foreign countries making it
very difficult for its citizens to import products, forcing them to buy domestic
products only. The middle and upper class of Argentina suffer the most from
this policy of prohibition of foreign exchange. Also, many companies that
require technology machinery that can only be imported have started shutting
down due to lack of availability. The most harmful effect of this policy is the
price increase all over Argentina due to lack of credit sources. Argentina’s
annual inflation rate exceeds 25%. This type of policy also results in
protection of many inefficient firms. The companies know that they are going to
be protected under that policy so it serves as a lack of incentive to work.
These policies promote capital intensive work but what the country fails to
realize is that small companies have to stick to labor intensive work due to lack
of credit sources. Although these policies will help Argentina boost its
economy in the short run, in the long run it will stop growing, as the domestic
producers will be inefficient compared to the international producers. And high
government intervention, there are always chances of corruption, with companies
bribing the government for their own benefit.
In
conclusion, Argentina should follow this policy only for a short term to
promote the domestic industry and increase exports to gain more revenue. In the
long run it can be harmful due to misallocation of resources and the consumers
will not be happy due to lack of choice. This policy will prove to be helpful
in boosting Argentina’s economy, but only in the short term.
1 comment:
Good to see that you worked hard on this essay.
Expectation are high,
you are writing in very general, need to discuss at least two to three specific polices that would have had a effect on various stakeholder.
Missing bibliography.
I dont see any exceptional input by you in this week.
Post a Comment