Usually, in a competitive market
structure is it assumed that the firm and consumer have equal information about
the goods. However, in reality, this is not how a market works. Asymmetric Information refers to that
situation where buyers and sellers possess unequal information. This usually
leads to an underallocation of resources to the production of the particular
good or service and the party with less information is vulnerable to
exploitation due to their lack of knowledge.
There are abundant examples for
situations when the buyer and seller respectively possess more information than
the other. One such example that is seen commonly is the excess information
possessed by the buyers of insurance- be it health or any other.
Moral
Hazard refers to the situation where one party takes risks but does not
face the full cost of these risks. It is typically seen when either the
consumer or producer changes their behaviour after an agreement is made. For
instance, after receiving insurance for one’s car, the car owner might drive it
recklessly as compared to if their car was not insured.
The moral hazard problem in
relation to purchasing insurance:-
Many individuals who indulge in
activities such as smoking and alcoholism, that deteriorate their health, often
withhold information from the insurance companies about the degree to which
they indulge in these activities so as to prevent having to pay a very high
premium due to the high probability of them having health issues in the future.
Another issue faced by these companies is the change in behaviour of the
consumers once they are aware of the fact that they will receive treatment
for their illnesses at a lower cost due to their insurance.
Since it is the producers or
providers of insurance who face the problem, it is they who have
to deal with it. One method to try and ensure that the buyers bare part of the
cost of damages or burden of their risks, are ‘out of pocket payments’. These
are aimed to reduce the risky behaviour of the insurance buyers by making them
face the consequences for such behaviour.
An issue that often arises with
these ‘out of pocket payments’ is that it affects different income earners
differently. As a result of this, the low-income earners tend to change their
risky behaviour since they get offered less insurance protection. Whereas, the high-income
earners have almost no incentive to change their risky behaviour.
In financial areas, as in the case
of the buying and selling of loans, moral hazard is dealt with through
government regulations for the financial institutions in order to reduce the
risky behaviour. However, this leads to various discussions regarding the
degree of the regulations that are required in order for them to be effective.
Citations
Tragakes, Ellie. "Chapter 5: Market
Failure/ Section 1: Microeconomics."Economics
for the IB Diploma. 2nd ed. N.p.: Cambridge UP, n.d. 132-34. Print.
"Moral Hazard." YouTube. MR University, 23 Sept. 2015. Web. 8 Jan. 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment